1.
Effects of probiotics administration on lactose intolerance in adulthood: A meta-analysis.
Ahn, SI, Kim, MS, Park, DG, Han, BK, Kim, YJ
Journal of dairy science. 2023;106(7):4489-4501
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Milk and dairy products are good sources of protein, calcium and other nutrients. However, many people experience lactose intolerance due to their digestive tract's inability to digest lactose, resulting in symptoms such as flatulence, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. Oral administration of certain friendly live microorganisms or probiotics can help digest lactose more efficiently as they have greater β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity. β-galactosidase is an enzyme responsible for the digestion of lactose in the dairy products. A total of twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results of this meta-analysis showed an improvement in the symptoms of lactose intolerance in adult patients, following probiotic administration. Probiotic administration was also found to enhance the digestion of lactose and calcium absorption in adult patients. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the potential benefits of oral supplementation of probiotics for adult lactose intolerance patients. However, further studies are needed to understand the relationship between calcium absorption and lactose digestion after probiotic administration.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of probiotic administration on adults with lactose intolerance. Twelve studies were identified from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effect size was estimated using the standardized mean difference (SMD), and Cochrane's Q test was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity of the effect size. Moderator analysis, including meta-ANOVA and meta-regression, were performed to determine the cause of heterogeneity in the effect size using a mixed-effect model. Egger's linear regression test was conducted to evaluate publication bias. The results showed that probiotic administration alleviated the symptoms of lactose intolerance, including abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence. Among them, the area under the curve (AUC) showed the greatest decrease following probiotic administration (SMD, -4.96; 95% confidence interval, -6.92 to -3.00). In the meta-ANOVA test, abdominal pain and total symptoms decreased with monostrain probiotic administration. This combination was also effective for flatulence. The dosage of probiotics or lactose was significantly associated with a reduction in the total symptom score, and the linear regression models between the dosage and SMD were found to be Y = 2.3342 × dosage - 25.0400 (R2 = 79.68%) and Y = 0.2345 × dosage - 7.6618 (R2 = 34.03%), respectively. Publication bias was detected for most items. However, even after effect size correction, the probiotic administration effect for all items remained valid. The administration of probiotics was effective at improving adult lactose intolerance, and it is expected that the results of this study could help improve the nutritional status of adults by increasing their consumption of milk and dairy products in the future.
2.
Is perceived intolerance to milk and wheat associated with the corresponding IgG and IgA food antibodies? A cross sectional study in subjects with morbid obesity and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Kvehaugen, AS, Tveiten, D, Farup, PG
BMC gastroenterology. 2018;18(1):22
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dairy and gluten are the most common triggers of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the general population. Food intolerance is generally detected by IgG antibodies, but the test is controversial. In this cross-sectional study, 97 obese subjects (82.4% women) were included, of which 72.1% had gastrointestinal symptoms, 35.7% had IBS, 31.4% had symptoms of milk intolerance, 28.6% had symptoms of wheat intolerance, and 15.7% had symptoms of intolerance to both milk and wheat. The study examined the association between IgA and IgG antibodies corresponding to milk and wheat in subjects with and without gastrointestinal issues and with and without perceptions of food sensitivity. The results of this study found no association between s-IgG and s-IgA antibodies and perceived food intolerances to milk and wheat among morbidly obese subjects. Although IgA against gliadin correlated with increased levels of zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, tight-junctional gut permeability inversely correlated with wheat intolerance. Furthermore, the study results revealed a significant correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against wheat and a marginal correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against gluten. Further robust research is needed to confirm these findings. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the current developments and the controversy surrounding food intolerance testing.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum IgG and IgA food antibodies have been used for dietary advice to subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and perceived food intolerance, but the role of these antibodies in mediating intolerance is controversial. The present study investigated associations between perceived gastrointestinal intolerance to milk-or wheat and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity. METHODS Subjects with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related complications) were included. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was diagnosed based on the Rome III criteria. Severity of specific gastrointestinal symptoms were measured with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)-IBS. S-IgG against cow's milk, cheese, wheat and gluten, and s-IgA against casein and gliadin were measured. RESULTS Ninety-seven subjects (80 females) with mean age 45 (SD 8.4) years were included, 70 had gastrointestinal complaints, 25 had IBS, and 22 and 20 reported milk- and wheat- intolerance respectively. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations or proportions of subjects above defined cut-off values for the antibodies between subjects with and without gastrointestinal complaints. In the group with gastrointestinal complaints, no significant differences were found between subjects with and without perceived food intolerance. Except for a significant correlation between IgG against cheese and GSRS-diarrhea (Rho: -0.25, P = 0.04), no significant correlations were found between the antibodies and type or degree of gastrointestinal symptoms, including IBS. CONCLUSIONS The study showed no associations between perceived milk or wheat intolerance and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity.
3.
Clinical relevance of IgG antibodies against food antigens in Crohn's disease: a double-blind cross-over diet intervention study.
Bentz, S, Hausmann, M, Piberger, H, Kellermeier, S, Paul, S, Held, L, Falk, W, Obermeier, F, Fried, M, Schölmerich, J, et al
Digestion. 2010;81(4):252-64
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Environmental factors are thought to play a part in the development of or exacerbation of symptoms in Crohn's disease (CD), and patients often implicate food as a contributing factor. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) food reactions can be rare in IBD and immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing can be controversial, this study set out to compare IgG antibody reactions in 79 CD patients and 20 healthy individuals. The pilot study measured IgG levels against 271 foods in the blood. It then went on to measure stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being following a 6 week specific elimination diet (based on foods identified by the IgG testing) or a 6 week sham diet. 23 participants were included in the follow on 12 week, cross-over double blinded study. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in stool was also measured to evaluate disease activity. The pilot study showed a significantly higher IgG reaction in the CD patients. In the follow-up study there was a decrease in stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being during the specific diet compared to the sham diet. EDN was found to decrease in both the specific and sham diet. It was concluded that IgG antibodies may contribute to CD but the mechanism is still not clear.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental factors are thought to play an important role in the development of Crohn's disease (CD). Immune responses against auto-antigens or food antigens may be a reason for the perpetuation of inflammation. METHODS In a pilot study, 79 CD patients and 20 healthy controls were examined for food immunoglobulin G (IgG). Thereafter, the clinical relevance of these food IgG antibodies was assessed in a double-blind cross-over study with 40 patients. Based on the IgG antibodies, a nutritional intervention was planned. The interferon (IFN)gamma secretion of T cells was measured. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin was quantified in stool. RESULTS The pilot study resulted in a significant difference of IgG antibodies in serum between CD patients and healthy controls. In 84 and 83% of the patients, respectively, IgG antibodies against processed cheese and yeast were detected. The daily stool frequency significantly decreased by 11% during a specific diet compared with a sham diet. Abdominal pain reduced and general well-being improved. IFNgamma secretion of T cells increased. No difference for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in stool was detected. CONCLUSION A nutritional intervention based on circulating IgG antibodies against food antigens showed effects with respect to stool frequency. The mechanisms by which IgG antibodies might contribute to disease activity remain to be elucidated.